区块链行业主要上市公司:目前国内区块链行业的上市公司主要有腾讯控股(00700.HK)、阿里巴巴(09988.HK)、聚链集团(430361.OC)、太一云(430070.OC)、开创集团(872123.OC)等。
The main listed companies in the sector of the 本文核心数据:腾讯和阿里巴巴专利申请数量、专利市场价值、专利合作申请、重点专利布局 core data: and number of patent applications from Alibaba, market value of patents, patent cooperation applications, priority patent distribution 全文统计口径说明:1)搜索关键词:区块链及与之相近似或相关关键词;2)搜索范围:标题、摘要和权利说明;3)筛选条件:简单同族申请去重、法律状态为实质审查、授权、PCT国际公布、PCT进入指定国(指定期),简单同族申请去重是按照受理局进行统计。4)统计截止日期:2021年8月30日。5)若有特殊统计口径会在图表下方备注。 full-text statistical calibre note: 1) Search keywords: block chains and similar or related keywords; 2) Search scope: title, summary and statement of rights; 3) Screening conditions: simple homogenous application for weighting, legal status for substantive review, authorization, PCT international publication, PCT entry into the designated country (design period), simple homogeneity application for weighting to be counted according to the receiving authority. 4) Statistical cut-off date: 30 August 2021. 5) Special statistical calibres are noted under the chart. 1、中国区块链市场竞争格局:腾讯和阿里巴巴为中国两大龙头 在中国移动通信联合会区块链专业委员会等组织的指导下,链塔智库发布了“2020中国区块链企业百强榜”,阿里巴巴位居榜单首位,腾讯位居第七位。与此同时,腾讯还登上了“2020福布斯全球区块链50强榜”。作为中国两大科技巨头,腾讯和阿里巴巴是区块链行业当之无愧的两大龙头企业。 Under the guidance of organizations such as 2、腾讯VS阿里巴巴区块链技术布局对比 2, a comparison of the technical layout of the VS Alibaba block chain 1)腾讯VS阿里巴巴-区块链专利申请量及PCT申请量对比:腾讯总量领先,阿里巴巴PCT领先 1) Comparison of patent applications for VS Alibaba - Block Chain applications and PCT applications: Top total number of requests and lead by Alibaba PCT
在区块链专利申请量方面,腾讯区块链专利申请总量是阿里巴巴区块链专利申请量的1.5倍以上,分别为1482项和867项。
With regard to the number of applications for block chain patents, the total number of applications for block chain patents in the Tseng area was more than 1.5 times the number of applications for block chain patents in the Alibaba area, with 1,482 and 867 applications, respectively.
然而,腾讯区块链PCT专利申请量少于阿里巴巴区块链PCT专利申请量,分别为25项和164项。
However, the number of applications for PCT patents in the tether block chain was less than the number of applications for PCT patents in the Alibaba block chain, with 25 applications and 164 applications, respectively.
从趋势上看,腾讯布局区块链技术较早,2011年便申请了一项区块链专利。2016年起,阿里巴巴开始申请区块链专利,并连续两年申请量超过腾讯。2019年起,腾讯在区块链领域专利申请量每年均比阿里巴巴多。
In 2016, Ali Baba started applying for block chain patents, and for two years in a row, the number of applications exceeded the number of requests. Since 2019, the number of applications for block chain patents has been higher than that of Ali Babado each year.
2020年,腾讯区块链专利申请量为587项,阿里巴巴区块链专利申请量为231项。2021年1-8月,腾讯区块链专利申请量为67项,而阿里巴巴区块链专利申请量仅有2项。
In 2020, there were 587 applications for patents for the Tingbaba block chain and 231 applications for the Alibaba block chain. In January-August 2021, there were 67 applications for the Tungbaba block chain and only 2 applications for the Alibaba block chain.
2)腾讯VS阿里巴巴-区块链专利市场价值对比:阿里巴巴专利市场价值更高
2) Reminds VS Alibaba - Price Comparison of Block Chain Patents: Higher Market Value of Alibaba Patents
阿里巴巴区块链专利总价值高于腾讯,阿里巴巴区块链专利总价值为2.04亿美元,是腾讯的近10倍。在专利价值分布方面,两者大多数区块链专利价值主要集中在3万-30万美元。
The total value of the Aribaba block chain patents is higher than the Tseng, with the total value of the Aribaba block chain patents amounting to $204 million, almost 10 times that of the Tsing. In terms of the distribution of the value of the patents, most of the chains in both cases are concentrated in $30,000 to $300,000.
3)腾讯VS阿里巴巴-区块链专利合作申请对比:阿里巴巴合作申请较多
3) Comparison of applications for cooperation in patenting VS Alibaba - Block Chain: More applications for cooperation in Alibaba
在专利合作申请方面,阿里巴巴与其它人合作申请区块链专利数量较多,目前阿里巴巴合作申请的区块链专利数量共有25项,而腾讯仅有9项合作的区块链专利。
With regard to patent cooperation applications, the number of block chain patents filed by Alibaba in cooperation with others is relatively high, with a total of 25 block chain patents currently applied by Alibaba in cooperation, while only nine partnership block chain patents are available.
统计口径说明:根据[标]原始申请(专利权)人计算,不支持编辑和合并名称。
4)腾讯VS阿里巴巴-区块链专利申请地域对比:腾讯主要分布中国,阿里巴巴以中国香港为主
4) Regional comparison of patent applications for VS Alibaba - Block Chain: Tseng is mainly distributed in China, while Alibaba is dominated by Hong Kong, China
目前,腾讯的区块链专利申请区域主要集中在中国,在中国申请的区块链专利数量为1540项;中国香港为腾讯区块链专利申请的第二大地区,申请数量为645项。阿里巴巴的区块链专利申请区域主要集中在中国香港,在中国香港申请的区块链专利数量为296项;新加坡为阿里巴巴区块链专利申请的第二大地区,申请数量为194项。
At present, the area of block chain patent applications in Quest is concentrated in China, with the number of block chain patents in China being 1540; and in Hong Kong, China, the second largest area to apply for block chain patents in Queenston are 645. The area of block chain patent applications in Alibaba is concentrated in Hong Kong, China, with 296 block chain patents in Hong Kong, China; and in Singapore, the second largest area to apply for block chain patents in the Alibaba district, with 194 applications.
统计口径说明:按每件申请显示一个公开文本的去重规则进行统计,并选择公开日最新的文本计算。
Statistical caliber description: Calculated on the basis of the weighting rule for each application showing a public text and choosing the latest version of the public day.
5)腾讯VS阿里巴巴-区块链专利类型对比:两者以发明专利为主
5) Comparison of the VS Alibaba - Block Chain Patent Type: The two are based on the patent of the invention
腾讯和阿里巴巴的区块链专利申请类型均以发明专利为主。腾讯全部区块链专利为发明专利;阿里巴巴14项区块链实用新型专利,其它均为发明专利。
The patent for all block chains is the patent for inventions; the patent for 14 block chains in Alibaba is a new type of patent for inventions, and all others are patented for inventions.
6)腾讯VS阿里巴巴-区块链专利技术构成对比:两者布局第一大细分领域不一致,腾讯聚焦领域更为明显
6 Comparison of VS Alibaba - Block Chain Patent Technology: The first segment of the layout is inconsistent, and the focus area is more pronounced
目前,“信息检索;数据库结构;文件系统结构[2019.01]”为腾讯的第一大区块链技术细分分布领域,专利申请量为489项;“支付体系结构、方案或协议(用于执行或登入支付业务的设备入G07F7/08,G07F19/00;电子现金出纳机入G07G1/12)〔8,2012.01〕”为阿里巴巴的第一大区块链技术细分分布领域,专利申请量为204项。两者其它重点细分区块链技术布局情况如下:
At present, “ information retrieval; database structure; document system structure [2019.01] & rdquo; first block chain technical breakdown area for telecommunications, 489 patent applications; & & & & ldquo; payment system structure, programme or agreement (equipment used to execute or log into payment operations entered G07F7/08, G07F19/00; e-cash teller entered G07G1/12) [8,201.01] & rdquao; and second block technology breakdown area for Albaba, 204 patent applications. The other key breakdowns are as follows:
从区块链专利聚焦的领域看,目前腾讯的区块链专利聚焦领域较明显,其主要聚焦于区块链、计算机设备、数据处理等领域。
In terms of the area of focus of patents on block chains, the current area of focus of patents on block chains is more pronounced, focusing mainly on areas such as block chains, computer equipment, data processing, etc.
7)腾讯VS阿里巴巴-区块链重点专利布局对比:腾讯被引用次数多,阿里巴巴专利家族规模大
在重点专利布局上,腾讯重点布局的专利为“基于区块链的信息处理、查询、储存方法和装置”,该项专利被引用次数19次,专利家族规模为1项。阿里巴巴重点布局的专利为“区块链网络中的数据隔离”,该项专利被引用次数2次,专利家族规模为20项。整体来看,腾讯重点布局的专利在专利被引用次数上领先,阿里巴巴重点布局的专利在专利家族规模较腾讯大。
In priority patent layouts, the patent is “ the patent is based on block chain information processing, search, storage methods and devices & & rdquo; the patent is cited 19 times and the family size of the patent is 1 item. Alibaba priority layout is & ldquao; data segregation in the network of blocks & & rdquo; the patent is cited twice, and the family size of the patent is 20.
注:①当分析偏好选择为[所有搜索结果(不分组)]、[每件申请显示一个公开文本]和[每组PatSnap同族一个专利代表]时,此图表专利家族使用PatSnap同族,并选择公开日最新的文本计算。
Note: When analysing preferences for [all search results (non-grouped)], [each application displays a public text] and [each group of PatSnap homogenous patent representative], the family uses the PatSnap homogeneity and chooses the latest version of the open day.
②分析偏好选择[每组简单同族一个专利代表]、[每组INPADOC同族一个专利代表]时,此图表专利家族使用设置的去重方式,并选择公开日最新的文本计算。
2 When analysing preferences [one patent representative per group of simple homogenes] and [one patent representative per group of INPADOC homogenes], the chart patent family uses the decomposition method and selects the latest available text on the public day.
8)腾讯VS阿里巴巴-区块链专利创新战略总结
整体来看,阿里巴巴区块链技术在数量增长、合作性、国际化、专业化、市场推动上具有相对竞争优势,腾讯区块链技术则在多样化上具有相对竞争优势。两者区块链技术在质量提升和学术驱动方面相当。
On the whole, the techniques of the Aribaba block chain have a comparative competitive advantage in terms of volume growth, cooperation, internationalization, specialization, market promotion, and diversification. The technologies of the block chain are comparable in terms of quality enhancement and academic drive.
以上数据及分析请参考于前瞻产业研究院《中国区块链行业市场前瞻与投资战略规划分析报告》,同时前瞻产业研究院还提供产业大数据、产业研究、产业链咨询、产业图谱、产业规划、园区规划、产业招商引资、IPO募投可研、IPO业务与技术撰写、IPO工作底稿咨询等解决方案。
注册有任何问题请添加 微信:MVIP619 拉你进入群
打开微信扫一扫
添加客服
进入交流群
发表评论